Agree.bugatti is still better.lol
Actually it's underpriced. You might argue that makes it overengineered, but considering Bugatti sell them at a loss (and quite a substantial one) you can hardly say they're overpriced.Bugatti is over priced!
one question......why didn't they make the viper 4wd, at least it would have a better chance at traction
i disagree the bugatti is built for speed and high speed cornering..
josh is rite when he said yanks dont know suspention, they also dont know brakes..
they relesed a new camaro or something like that with 500hp and it was way over priced but sill had leaf and spring set up.. who builds a car with a heap of HP and puts leaf and spring?? thats dumb imo
Actually it's underpriced. You might argue that makes it overengineered, but considering Bugatti sell them at a loss (and quite a substantial one) you can hardly say they're overpriced.
But they are ludicrously expensive.
i agree bout the GT40, i was watching a doco on the gt40 and it muched a ferrari enzo
Not an Enzo it didn't...Beat it 3 years in a row in the 60's in Le Mans. Go Ford!
Not an Enzo it didn't...